Why Data Governance Is the Bedrock of AI in GLP Laboratories —and How Strategic Archiving Reinforces Quality Assurance

The AI Revolution in Regulated Laboratories

As digital transformation reshapes how regulated industries operate, artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging as a game-changer for laboratory science. Whether it’s uncovering patterns in large datasets or enabling more accurate predictive modelling, AI brings new efficiencies and insights to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) settings. Yet, these powerful technologies are only as effective as the data behind them.
In GLP-regulated environments, where compliance, reproducibility, and traceability are paramount, the effectiveness of AI is directly tied to the integrity and structure of the underlying data. This is where data governance comes into play. When paired with long-term digital archiving, data governance becomes the linchpin of trustworthy AI systems—offering both the regulatory assurance and technological foundation needed to drive innovation responsibly.

Data Governance: A Non-Negotiable in Regulated Labs

GLP laboratories function within stringent regulatory frameworks where the credibility of scientific results depends entirely on the integrity of the data lifecycle. According to the OECD’s Advisory Document No. 22 on computerized systems, maintaining data reliability and security throughout its lifecycle is not just best practice—it’s a regulatory requirement.

Critical components outlined in the guideline include clearly assigned data ownership, robust access controls, audit trail capabilities, and well-defined change control procedures. Data governance ensures these components are not isolated checkboxes but integrated elements of a comprehensive digital framework. This structure becomes even more vital when introducing AI into lab workflows.

Any inconsistency or deviation in data—no matter how minor—can compromise the outcome of an AI model, leading to flawed conclusions or regulatory setbacks. In this context, data governance isn't simply about ensuring compliance; it's about instilling trust—in both human and algorithmic decision-making.

Long-Term Archiving: Ensuring Continuity and Compliance

While active data management remains essential, long-term archiving takes on a pivotal role, especially in GLP environments where data retention obligations span many years. Proper archiving safeguards not just raw data, but also metadata and audit trails, keeping them intact, accessible, and verifiable for future needs.

Well-executed digital archiving strategies ensure that information remains:
•    Usable and readable regardless of technological shifts,
•    Secure against loss or tampering,
•    Easily retrievable for retrospective analysis or audits.

From an AI standpoint, this archival continuity is indispensable. AI systems rely on historical data for training, testing, and validation. If this data becomes fragmented, inaccessible, or degraded over time, the reliability of the AI output deteriorates. Imagine training a toxicity prediction model with partial datasets due to incomplete archival practices—the consequences could include inaccurate assessments or overlooked anomalies.

In this light, long-term archiving is no longer a passive storage solution, but a cornerstone of a lab’s long-term data strategy—supporting both regulatory audits and forward-looking AI initiatives.

Lessons from AI Project Failures: The Case for Governance

Despite the growing adoption of AI, the majority of projects fail to meet expectations. Industry research—such as a 2023 RAND Corporation study—highlights that over 80% of AI initiatives falter due to poor data quality, unclear goals, and fragmented processes. Behind these issues often lies a deeper cause: the absence of strong data governance.

This is particularly relevant to GLP labs, where data ecosystems are frequently decentralized, scattered across disparate systems like ELNs, LIMS platforms, and legacy databases. Without an overarching governance strategy to unify and standardize data inputs, AI systems become vulnerable to bias, misinterpretation, and breakdowns in reproducibility.

However, there's a silver lining. GLP laboratories already adhere to some of the strictest data management practices in scientific domains. By extending these existing principles into a broader digital governance framework, they’re uniquely equipped to succeed where others might falter.

Metadata and Traceability: The Unsung Heroes of AI Readiness

In the pursuit of AI implementation, metadata often receives less attention than it deserves. Yet, it provides the vital context that transforms raw data into something usable and meaningful. Details like the origin of data, associated protocols, instrumentation used, and conditions of acquisition are essential for any system—human or algorithmic—to interpret findings accurately.

Data governance frameworks ensure this metadata is systematically recorded, standardized, and preserved. This commitment directly enhances traceability, allowing both researchers and auditors to understand the lineage of the data—when it was created, how it evolved, and how it contributed to final outputs.

Such traceability is not just a technical benefit—it’s an increasingly important regulatory expectation. Agencies like the FDA and EMA now call for transparency into algorithm development processes, including data lineage and training practices. With strong metadata practices in place, labs are far better positioned to meet these evolving demands.

Governance as the Catalyst for Cultural Change

Introducing AI into GLP environments doesn’t merely require technology; it demands organizational alignment. Scientists, quality assurance personnel, IT teams, and data professionals all have distinct needs and responsibilities—but their work converges around shared data systems.

Data governance acts as a bridge between these domains. It offers clear definitions, responsibilities, and standards that help ensure consistent data usage and interpretation across departments. When implemented effectively, governance doesn’t stifle innovation—it enables it, creating a secure framework in which AI tools can deliver meaningful, validated insights.

Ultimately, governance fosters the cultural maturity necessary for labs to navigate digital transformation. It's the glue that binds operational discipline with innovation.

Final Thoughts: A Future-Proof Foundation

In the context of GLP laboratories looking to embrace AI, data governance and long-term archiving are no longer optional—they’re mission-critical. These foundational elements ensure data integrity, compliance, and reproducibility, while also enabling the advanced analytics that future-ready labs require.

By embedding quality at every step of the data lifecycle—from capture and contextualization to preservation and reuse—labs not only stay ahead of regulatory expectations but also unlock the true potential of artificial intelligence.

To realize this vision, labs need systems that can support and scale with their governance strategies. biomedion’s integrated data management platform is purpose-built for regulated environments, offering features such as automated data ingestion, validated archiving, metadata enrichment, and full traceability.

Aligned with OECD GLP principles, the platform empowers labs to maintain data integrity while confidently pursuing AI innovation—delivering compliant, high-quality results every step of the way.

References: