biomedion Newsroom

Why St. Nicholas Relies on biomedion in His GLP Lab and Saves More CO₂ Than Rudolph’s Entire Reindeer Herd Produces

Written by Product Management | Dec 5, 2025 5:30:58 PM

A (mostly) true story from the North Pole Research Institute about data integrity, GLP compliance and Green IT – and why Excel is not your long-term archive

Prologue: Saint Nicholas, Santa Claus – and only one of them runs a GLP lab

Let’s clear this up first:
No, Saint Nicholas and Santa Claus are not the same person – and certainly not the same compliance profile.

•    Santa Claus: Logistics genius, delivers gifts on 24 December, wears red, has the Coca-Cola contract.
•    Saint Nicholas: Arrives on 6 December, wears a bishop’s mitre – and in our story, runs a GLP laboratory at the North Pole.

In this (semi-scientific) tale, Nicholas is a PhD pharmacologist specialising in gingerbread toxicology and mulled wine pharmacokinetics. And like every regulated lab, he faces the usual challenges: data, Excel, compliance and CO₂ footprint.

Chapter 1: The North Pole Research Institute – when magic must be GLP-compliant

The North Pole Research Institute (NRI) was founded in 1347, right after the “Gingerbread Poisoning Crisis” of 1346, when 347 children suffered stomach aches from non-GMP-compliant gingerbread.

Since then, the rule at the North Pole has been: “Never again! From now on, everything gets tested!” – Nicholas, ca. 1347

What NRI works on:
•    Gingerbread pharmacokinetics: How fast are cinnamon and cloves metabolised in children?
•    Chocolate toxicology: At what dose does chocolate really become dangerous? (Spoiler: kids are doing fine.)
•    Nut allergy research: Critical for the gift selection process.
•    Mulled wine analysis: What makes it so… effective?
•    Reindeer performance optimisation: Doping controls for Rudolph & friends (the red nose is natural).
•    Cookie stability at –40 °C: Shelf-life under polar conditions.

Of course, the lab is fully GLP-compliant:

•    GLP according to OECD principles
•    FDA 21 CFR Part 58
•    EU GMP Annex 11
•    “North Pole Food Safety Directive 1347/NIK”

Then came the archiving disaster of 2022.

Chapter 2: The Excel disaster – how a 2.4 GB file almost killed gingerbread approval

4 December 2022, 09:23.
Nicholas opens the legendary file:

Gingerbread_Toxicology_Study_2017_2022_LONGTERM_FINAL.xlsx

File contents:
•    2.4 GB of Excel
•    6 years of toxicology data
•    47,294 individual measurements
•    Raw data from 23 analytical instruments
•    1,847 VBA macros
•    Chromatograms embedded as images

Nicholas clicks “Open”. Excel responds with: “(Not responding)”

30 minutes later: Bluescreen.
On restart, the bad news: file corrupted, last backup one year old, 12 months of data lost.

Worst timing possible:
The FDA has scheduled an inspection for 5 December – yes, also at the North Pole. The inspectors want complete raw data for the past six years.

Risk scenario:
•    No complete GLP raw data
•    Gingerbread approval for 2023 in danger
•    A world without gingerbread. For anyone.

At this point it’s painfully clear:
Excel is an analysis tool – not a long-term GLP archive.

Chapter 3: biomedion to the rescue – a support call from the North Pole

The lead elf scientist Dr Ruprecht (yes, that Knecht Ruprecht, with a PhD in toxicology) has an idea:

“I know someone. biomedion from Jena. 20+ years of experience in GxP-compliant long-term archiving. If they can handle pharma data, they can save our gingerbread data.”

The emergency call goes out:

“biomedion support, Andreas Suchanek speaking.”

“This is Nicholas. I have an Excel problem and the FDA is coming tomorrow.”

A quick look out of the office window – three reindeer on the parking lot – and the project is on.

Chapter 4: The solution – Watcher 4.0 instead of Excel monoliths

The biomedion team analyses the NRI environment and sees a textbook case of “what not to do”:

Status quo:

•    One 2.4 GB Excel file as “archive”
•    No version control
•    No audit trail
•    Raw data, calculations and macros all in one file
•    Proprietary formats from 23 devices
•    No validated system
•    No long-term migration strategy

Target state:
GxP-compliant, scalable, audit-ready long-term archiving based on  Watcher 4.0  from biomedion.
Implementation – fast, structured, compliant

Within a very short timeframe, the following changes are made:

Instrument integration with Watcher 4.0 :

•    Automatic acquisition of raw data from all 23 instruments (HPLC, GC-MS, LC-MS, UV-Vis, particle counters, …)
•    Storage in the original format plus a normalised, long-term readable format
•    Full metadata capture for each record (user, time, project, batch, etc.)
•    No manual file copying, no copy-paste errors

Archiving architecture:

•    Central database for structured study data
•    File-based archiving for raw data and chromatograms
•    WORM storage for data integrity
•    Encryption at rest and in transit
•    Geographically redundant backups – including North Pole, Antarctica and Jena

GLP/GxP compliance features:

•    Complete audit trails
•    Electronic signatures with 2FA
•    Validation documentation and SOPs
•    Fully aligned with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and GLP expectations

Legacy data migration:

•    Extraction of data from the corrupted Excel file
•    Combination with existing backups
•    Validation of reconstructed data sets
•    Result: 99.7% of data recovered

The remaining 0.3%: duplicates and corrupt cells – no impact on patient/consumer safety or study validity.

Chapter 5: CO₂ footprint – how Nicholas became a climate hero

Beyond compliance and reliability, the NRI also transforms its CO₂ footprint.

Before: On-premise IT powered by diesel

•    3 file servers @ 300 W
•    2 backup servers @ 250 W
•    15 high-end lab PCs @ 250 W
•    High cooling demand (PUE ~ 2.5)
•    Electricity supplied by diesel generators at the North Pole

Annual energy consumption:
≈ 112,590 kWh

CO₂ emissions (diesel-based):
≈ 73.2 t CO₂/year

Plus diesel transport by dog sled:
•    ~5 t CO₂/year

Total: ~78.2 t CO₂/year

After: Cloud (renewable energy) + thin clients
•   Watcher 4.0 hosted in a data centre powered by 100% renewable energy
•    15 thin clients @ 50 W
•    No local servers, no server room cooling

Annual energy consumption:
≈ 4,300 kWh

CO₂ emissions (renewable data centre):
≈ 0.086 t CO₂/year

Savings: ~78.1 t CO₂ per year

In North Pole units:

•    One reindeer herd emits roughly 12 t CO₂/year (mainly methane).
•    With biomedion, Nicholas saves 6.5× more CO₂ than his entire reindeer fleet produces.

The NRI is effectively CO₂ negative.

Chapter 6: Productivity, space and sanity – the side effects

Besides compliance and sustainability, Nicholas’ lab gains:

1.    Logistics relief
o    25,000 litres of diesel per year no longer needed
o    12 fewer sled transports from the mainland
2.    More lab space
o    Former server room becomes a new lab for long-term spekulatius stability studies – plus an elf espresso bar
3.    Massive time savings
o    No more long Excel recalculations
o    Data available in seconds instead of hours
o    ≈ 847 person-hours saved per year (~105 working days)
4.    Relaxed FDA inspections
o    Raw data, chromatograms, audit trails – all available within seconds
o    Outcome: zero findings

Chapter 7: ROI – does it actually pay off?

Total investment over five years:

•    Watcher licences: €45,000
•    Implementation & validation: €35,000
•    Maintenance & hosting: €18,000/year
•    Total 5-year cost: ≈ €170,000

Savings over five years:

•    Energy: ≈ €37,900
•    Diesel: ≈ €225,000
•    Productivity: ≈ €296,450
•    Avoided findings/data loss: conservatively +€100,000

Total savings: ~€659,000

That’s an ROI of around 388% over five years.

Or in simple terms:
For every €1 Nicholas invests in biomedion, he gets about €3.88 back – plus a significantly lower CO₂ footprint.

Chapter 8: What GLP labs can learn from Nicholas

1.    Excel is not a long-term archive
2.    GLP/GxP compliance requires validated systems
3.    Long-term readability is a strategic topic, not an afterthought
4.    Green IT and strict compliance are a natural match
5.    Automation reduces error rates and stress
6.    Modern cloud or hybrid solutions are often more secure and more sustainable than legacy on-premise setups

Become the Nicholas of your lab 

If any of these sound familiar:

•    Your Excel files exceed 100 MB
•    “_v2_final_really_final.xlsx” is your versioning concept
•    You worry about FDA or authority inspections
•    Your IT infrastructure burns more energy than necessary
•    You spend more time searching for data than analysing it

… then it’s time to talk about GxP-compliant long-term archiving with biomedion.

What biomedion can do for you:

•    GxP-compliant long-term archiving (FDA, EMA, OECD, GLP)
•    watcher 4.0 as central platform for data from instruments and study systems
•    Automated data capture and complete audit trail
•    Cloud-based or on-premise deployment – depending on your strategy
•    Demonstrable CO₂ savings through IT modernisation

Your next step:
Let’s jointly assess how much CO₂, risk and cost you could save by modernising your archiving strategy.

Discover how Watcher 4.0 can transform your laboratory’s data management – ensuring compliance, security, and efficiency every step of the way.

Learn more

Merry Nicholas Day, merry Christmas – and may your data always be safe, searchable and audit-ready.